|
Post by min on May 13, 2016 16:35:09 GMT
Thanks for fixing the spoilery stuff. I forgot where I was.
Getting back to trial by combat; both of Tyrion's trials were so. The gods decide. There is a matter of honor between both Ned and Arthur IMO over their sisters and a mutual respect which is why Ser Arthur is described as melancholy in the books. One of them will determine the outcome for any children involved. The gods decide.
The sword itself can only be claimed by a hero. If Ashara put the sword into Ned's keeping; he didn't claim it. But suppose these swords are bound by blood or bloodlines and broken the same way. If Winterfell is the place where Winter lost the battle with the last hero and the sword was taken; was it previously the sword of the evening; the long night? Now it's changed hands to become the dawn sword. Is this why there must always be a Stark in Winterfell or Winter is Coming if there isn't? Is there a tower at Winterfell that might be considered a sword tower?
Sorry, rambling, random thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by Melifeather on May 13, 2016 16:44:19 GMT
In a normal case, the taking of a fallen foe's things are called 'spoils of war', and that's a fair and legitimate thing. Or as the Ironborn say, paying the iron price.
|
|
|
Post by min on May 13, 2016 17:09:51 GMT
Another crazy thought.... Venus is both the morning star and the evening star. When it's the morning star it rises in the east and is seen in the west at sundown when it's the evening star. So "when the son rises in the east and sets in the west?"
|
|
|
Post by Ser Duncan on May 13, 2016 17:19:47 GMT
Getting back to trial by combat; both of Tyrion's trials were so. The gods decide. There is a matter of honor between both Ned and Arthur IMO over their sisters and a mutual respect which is why Ser Arthur is described as melancholy in the books. One of them will determine the outcome for any children involved. The gods decide. I see what you mean. Though I thought it was Ned that go melancholy when speaking of Arthur and it was Rhaegar's personality described as such*. I'm happy to be wrong! And there is definitely an aspect of 'let the gods decide' in the fight between Arthur and Ned. *Is that a coincidence? Or does Arthur know what Rhaegar knows, that which causes both of them to be melancholy? The sword itself can only be claimed by a hero. If Ashara put the sword into Ned's keeping; he didn't claim it Absolutely. In this case however, is there is no hero. Ned only won because of the intervention of Howland Reed, in whatever form that took in the books. So either of them could've claimed the sword. Mind you, Howland's claim to it would only be by the grace of his commander/lord, Eddard Stark. I think if Ashara (or better yet her father) gave the sword back to Ned, it would be a great honour. It's a gesture that says 'Thank you. You've earned this not by fighting, but by being a man above men to return it to us.' What I mean is, regardless of how it was given, it would be claimed by the victor. Even if Ned doesn't think of it as his, it's still his spoil of war. See what I mean? He may think it's left in safe keeping, and may indeed've intended to give it to the next Dayne worthy of the name Sword of the Morning, but by his taking it, it means he's the receiver of loot (not in a bad sense) from a battle.
|
|
|
Post by Ser Duncan on May 13, 2016 17:21:16 GMT
In a normal case, the taking of a fallen foe's things are called 'spoils of war', and that's a fair and legitimate thing. Or as the Ironborn say, paying the iron price. Just so. And well spotted!
|
|
|
Post by Melifeather on May 13, 2016 17:22:47 GMT
So "when the son rises in the east and sets in the west?" You meant this the other way around, right? "When the sun rises in the west and sets in the east." I interpret this as evidence of the open hinge, that Dorne is now Casterly Rock, and Casterly Rock is now "easterly".
|
|
|
Post by min on May 13, 2016 17:36:53 GMT
LOL Yes I got it backwards. But if the hinge is flipped.... I think my main point is that the sword is both the dawn sword and the evening sword.
|
|
|
Post by min on May 13, 2016 17:46:05 GMT
*Is that a coincidence? Or does Arthur know what Rhaegar knows, that which causes both of them to be melancholy? I'm open to Arthur knowing what Rhaegar knows and if NAJ is in play; perhaps Arthur also knows his sister is pregnant; something that Ned does not yet know. If there were broken promises to Ashara; that's also a matter of honor. Neither completely at fault and bound by oaths and loyalty. Something they both recognize and respect about each other.
|
|
|
Post by Ser Duncan on May 13, 2016 17:49:07 GMT
I'm open to Arthur knowing what Rhaegar knows and if NAJ is in play What do you mean? And can you expand on this please? I do like the idea of Arthur knowing all about his sister and that's what causes his melancholy.
|
|
|
Post by Melifeather on May 13, 2016 18:08:11 GMT
LOL Yes I got it backwards. But if the hinge is flipped.... I think my main point is that the sword is both the dawn sword and the evening sword. Awesome observation about the sword by the way as I have read more than one argument that Dawn is Ice and had remained unconvinced, but seeing it this way makes me want to reconsider. Going back to the Long Night when "the sword" was forged...first I have to insert that I think the original Lightbringer was a comet so any sword forged after the meteor shower was likely made of fallen moon meteor...anyways...if it's a magical sword, who's to say it cannot change properties between light and dark?
|
|
|
Post by Ser Duncan on May 13, 2016 18:24:46 GMT
While we're on the subject of swords, in TWoIaF, Arthur is portrayed as having two swords. I know I've said this on the show thread, and gone as far as calling the swords Dawn & Dusk, but what if there's more to it? Could Darkstar be the rightful owner of Dusk, the Sword of the Evening?
|
|
|
Post by min on May 13, 2016 18:24:55 GMT
I'm open to Arthur knowing what Rhaegar knows and if NAJ is in play What do you mean? And can you expand on this please? I do like the idea of Arthur knowing all about his sister and that's what causes his melancholy. All I meant is that Arthur is Rhaegar's closest friend, ally and confidente and knows the truth behind whatever transpired between Rhaegar and Lyanna or the reasons for taking her. If there is some necromancy involved at the ToJ; he will know about that as well. What's in the tower is the question. Is Lyanna in the tower or Starfall? In the book, when Ned tells Arthur that he has been looking for him; Arthur tells him they have been away South. So at Starfall; where Ned goes to meet Ashara who is waiting for him. This would make sense if Lyanna was pregnant that she would have her lying in with Ashara and other women present. Ned has a long memory lapse but Howland also tells him that he brings Lyanna blue roses every day. Where does he get the flowers? Apparently a rare flower grown in Winterfell's greenhouse. Does Starfall also cultivate blue roses? If NAJ is in play; I don't think Ned knows that Ashara had or will have a son or that Ashara knows that he can't keep his promise to her. But I think Arthur may know all the circumstances. But like everyone who actually knows what's going on, they get killed. It's still an open question for me.
|
|
|
Post by Ser Duncan on May 13, 2016 18:38:26 GMT
Thanks min . I was thinking the same things. Lyanna at Starfall with the other women; Arthur knowing Ned can't keep his honour where Ashara is concerned; etc. One more thing to think about is this. Say Lyanna is preggers with someone else's child and that baby won't be full term until later, and by later I mean months. It would put the happenings in the ToJ into a different light. There could be blood magic happening, on a newly pregnant woman, they could be taking the child/fetus from her in order to use its king's blood. The last is horrible, I know, but the key thing is we don't know. And if she was not full term, and ready to give birth, but rather just became pregnant, that would also fit with the inversion of Dany being in labour.
|
|
|
Post by min on May 13, 2016 18:47:50 GMT
Thanks min . I was thinking the same things. Lyanna at Starfall with the other women; Arthur knowing Ned can't keep his honour where Ashara is concerned; etc. One more thing to think about is this. Say Lyanna is preggers with someone else's child and that baby won't be full term until later, and by later I mean months. It would put the happenings in the ToJ into a different light. There could be blood magic happening, on a newly pregnant woman, they could be taking the child/fetus from her in order to use its king's blood. The last is horrible, I know, but the key thing is we don't know. And if she was not full term, and ready to give birth, but rather just became pregnant, that would also fit with the inversion of Dany being in labour. Yes, I can be persuaded and it fits the inversion and Robert as kidnapper. It would be crazy shocking. Even the faceless men have the face of an infant on their wall.
|
|
|
Post by Ser Duncan on May 13, 2016 18:57:54 GMT
Even the faceless men have the face of an infant on their wall.
|
|