|
Post by Weasel Pie on Aug 28, 2016 15:53:40 GMT
(I always thought it was about the ambiguous morality of colonialism).
|
|
|
Post by Melifeather on Aug 28, 2016 16:30:26 GMT
GRRM is a co-author, but it is an in-world history book written by maesters. It's not a factual source that can be used to prove or disprove the books. OK, but it if that is the division of labour then it seems like a strange co-incidence. How would you differentiate between GRRM writing as Gyldane in the World Book vs GRRM writing as Pycelle in GoT? History books, even real world, are written the way the author or victors want it. For instance, this World book was written as a gift for King Robert, who would want the historical record to state that Rhaegar kidnapped Lyanna, even if it turns out that he didn't.
|
|
|
Post by ac on Aug 28, 2016 17:11:40 GMT
OK, but it if that is the division of labour then it seems like a strange co-incidence. How would you differentiate between GRRM writing as Gyldane in the World Book vs GRRM writing as Pycelle in GoT? History books, even real world, are written the way the author or victors want it. For instance, this World book was written as a gift for King Robert, who would want the historical record to state that Rhaegar kidnapped Lyanna, even if it turns out that he didn't. First of all I don't want to hijack min 's thread here so maybe you or another admin could move these posts? But I do think it is worth talking about. I completely agree with you about anything written by Yandel (i.e. not GRRM) without attribution to Gyldayn. And I've said elsewhere that I believe the World Book was likely sponsored by the Lannisters. I consider the parts attributed to Gyldayn differently because: - They were actually written by GRRM (please correct my I'm wrong on this)
- Gyldayn's manuscript was written at a time when the Targs were relatively secure in their power
- The quotes would presumably be verifiable in world and so it's unlikely Yandel could alter them. Now that is not to say he could not have omitted parts that were unfavourable to the Baratheon's, Lannisters etc.
|
|
|
Post by min on Aug 28, 2016 17:31:58 GMT
Oh I don't mind if this a general discussion spinning off ideas to other threads or carrying on here.
|
|
|
Post by jnr on Aug 28, 2016 17:42:10 GMT
I grow weary of presenting one angle of the story, be it Trumbo or Marvel or whatever, only to be told, "Well, I don't think we should pigeonhole things into one source....unless it's my favorite source which should be held as the gospel foundation for the entire series." Yep. Same idea applies to the theory of R+L=J. You can choose any lens you like and view the series through it, and some (like Marvel) are well sourced in GRRM's background. But ultimately I think you'll get best results by taking the series as it is: a product of GRRM's magpie mind, that collects shiny ideas from a hundred sources and combines them to suit his tastes and goals. If you want to understand Bloodraven, then I think you should study Bloodraven, not a character from a book Conrad wrote over a hundred years ago. Not that it applies to the part you are talking about but my understanding was that GRRM wrote all of the parts attributed to Gyldayn. Is that right? Yes, it is. Specifically, the sidebar content. GRRM did also, to be fair, provide really extensive background and notes -- Ran didn't just make it up from scratch -- but if it's a question of who chose the specific phrase used to describe shadowbinders going upriver, I'd guess that came straight from Ran.
|
|
|
Post by Some Pig No Doubt on Aug 28, 2016 17:43:16 GMT
a product of GRRM's magpie mind This is a perfect description.
|
|
|
Post by Ser Duncan on Aug 28, 2016 18:02:54 GMT
I've read Heart of Darkness ages ago and can't remember most of it. Apocolypse Now though is one of my favourite films. I agree with min, the travelling that Marlowe does is very similar to Tyrion's trials by water. However, the Kurtz description, while having some bearing on Bloodraven, to me is more indicative of Varys. He's the bald guy in the middle of all things. This is especially true after Tyrion kills Tywin and Varys goes in to hiding. He's sitting in the HoD that is King's Landing, with its myriad dark passages and underground connections. And I still do not own, nor have I read the World book. I don't think it adds all that much to the story that can be relied upon. Not only is written with a Baratheon filter, but it's written to purposely skew the world view by a Maester of the Citadel. Clever Mr Martin has given us a filler to tide us over until he finishes his Magnum Opus.
|
|
|
Post by freyfamilyreunion on Aug 29, 2016 18:37:08 GMT
I definitely think that Conrad is big inspiration to Martin. He cites Conrad in an afterword in one of his Wildcard books:
Couple that with the poacher, Kurz, in ACOK, and it seems apparent that Conrad was a big inspiration.
I did find that Marlowe's overhearing the ivory traders conversation did very much remind me of Arya overhearing the conversation between Illyrio and Varys.
|
|
|
Post by min on Aug 29, 2016 18:49:50 GMT
I definitely think that Conrad is big inspiration to Martin. He cites Conrad in an afterword in one of his Wildcard books: Couple that with the poacher, Kurz, in ACOK, and it seems apparent that Conrad was a big inspiration. I did find that Marlowe's overhearing the ivory traders conversation did very much remind me of Arya overhearing the conversation between Illyrio and Varys. That's interesting. I'm about halfway through. I think the weirwood is standing in place of ivory since so much of it was cut down by the Andals.
|
|